JobCraft AI guide to Verify a job posting

Locate the employer’s careers page independently

If you discover a job on a general board or through a message, look up the company separately and navigate to its official careers page. Search for the title, location, and requisition number. Large employers may have several similar openings. Compare the details together before assuming that a result refers to the same vacancy. A missing listing might mean the posting has expired or is hosted elsewhere, so check through a contact channel you can verify.

Check who operates the application page

An employer may link to a third-party recruiting platform. The useful test is whether you can reach that exact vacancy from the employer’s official website. Compare the posting and contact details if the message links somewhere unusual. Do not use a link from a message as the only evidence that a page belongs to the employer. If in doubt, contact the company using information you found independently.

Recognize common job scam warning signs

The FTC warns about offers that require payment for a job, ask someone to deposit a check and send money onward, or seek sensitive details before the applicant has verified the employer. Treat urgency and requests for upfront payments as reasons to pause. A polished logo or apparent job title is easy to copy. Verify the source and the process before sharing documents. Read the FTC’s job scam guidance.

Use job details for analysis after verification

Once you have a verified posting, copy its responsibilities and qualifications into the ATS Keyword Generator to identify relevant skills and requirements. A textual analysis can help with your application, while verification depends on the employer and its official job page. Keep a dated link to the vacancy and check it again before submitting, because hiring teams can change location, eligibility details, or application deadlines.

Worked example and revision

Practice example: A board lists a remote analyst vacancy. The careers page shows a similar title with a different job ID and a different working location.

Start by looking at a role discovered on an external job board. Identify which part can be supported with the employer’s careers page and official requisition details, then make a note of anything that remains unclear. The example above is for practice. In a real application, the details that matter are the ones you can explain to a reader or verify independently. When uncertain about a claim, narrow it to the action or fact you can stand behind. You can always add context later if you find reliable supporting information.

Starting point: A message asks you to apply through an unfamiliar link.

Revision to try: Use the verified careers page to find the matching title, location, and requisition instead.

The revision shows where to focus if the first draft leaves a reader guessing. Before using it, consider a message whose link does not clearly identify the employer. Ask what the reader needs to know and what information would change their interpretation. A sentence may feel stronger because it has a precise term in it, but that term only helps if the reader can connect it to your evidence. Look for an unnecessary adjective or a claim that goes beyond what you know, and replace it with relevant context.

A short exercise you can do today

  1. Save a copy of the job description and any instructions that came with it. If this is a practice exercise, mark the draft clearly so it will not be mistaken for a real application. Choose one posting or conversation as your reference. Comparing several at the same time can make it harder to tell which requirement you are trying to address.
  2. Gather an independently located employer page and the job’s specific ID. Keep it brief enough to review in a single sitting. Where the material belongs to a former employer or another person, describe the relevant part instead of sharing the original. If you are preparing a sample, use fictional data and label it. The goal is to explain your reasoning without exposing someone else’s information.
  3. Check what organization operates the form. Pause if money or sensitive information is requested before you can establish the source. Write down the change you made and why it helps. If you find that the issue depends on something only the employer can answer, identify a specific question or check on its official page. Decide whether you need the answer before submitting or whether it is appropriate to ask later.
  4. Use the keyword tool only after obtaining the authentic job description. Save your own copy of the final text so you can review it if an employer contacts you. Reopen any exported file, check that you selected the intended version, and make sure you can explain its contents in your own words. If you changed a term to match the posting, check that the sentence still accurately describes what happened.

Review the result before you use it

A final review should establish whether the application route can be confirmed independently. Read your draft from the perspective of someone who has never seen your project, job, or original correspondence. They should be able to tell what the example is about without getting your entire work history. If the document contains a role title, location, or other detail that can change, verify it against the employer’s latest instructions. If your own timeline is uncertain, leave room to clarify it rather than giving someone a date you cannot commit to.

Try a second pass with a different question: what might a reader assume incorrectly? A job title can imply a scope you did not own. A number can imply that you measured more than you did. A tool name can suggest professional proficiency when all you have is a course project. These are often easy fixes. Add the setting, identify the team’s actual role, or explain what you did personally. Make sure the corrected version is as easy to understand as the original.

Use the JobCraft AI tool for this step

Open the JobCraft AI Verify a job posting resource and work on one part of the application at a time. For this exercise, keep the posting and your evidence beside the output. Compare the two before accepting any suggestion. Copy across what clarifies your experience and revise or remove anything that sounds broader than the facts. The tool can help you prepare, but the final version needs to reflect your own judgment and the instructions in the actual vacancy.